JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 1993

A- de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Arturo Sanchez Zambrano

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad De La Sentencia T-120/93. Pinsky. Concordato Preventivo Obligatorio.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

8 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Declaró la nulidad de Sentencia T-120/93, lo anterior, debido al desconocimiento de la cosa juzgada constitucional que implicó la violación del debido proceso, al dictarse la mencionada sentencia, precisamente por desconocerse el mandato del inciso primero del Art.243 de la Constitución.

En este sentido, mediante este auto ordenó comunicar al Superintendente de Sociedades y al Juez que conoció en primera instancia de la acción de tutela instaurada para que enviara el expediente a la Corporación y dictar la sentencia correspondiente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. 1o. DECLARASE nula la sentencia T-120 dictada por la Sala Septima de Revision, el dia 29 de marzo de 1993, en el proceso T-5088.
  3. 2o. COMUNIQUESE este auto al Superintendente de Sociedades y al Juez 24 Civil del Circuito de Santafe de Bogota, quien conocio en primera instancia de la accion de tutela instaurada por Pinski Asociados & S.A.
  4. 3o. Se ORDENA al mismo Juzgado 24 Civil del Circuito, el envio del expediente de tutela de Pinski Asociados & S.A., a la Corte Constitucional para dictar la sentencia correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroConcurrenceFabio Morón DíazDissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.